I’ve not used Simpson as an expert in a case for more than a decade. I point this out not because he is unqualified. In fact, he is supremely qualified. I’ve just not used him for a long time, and therefore, I certainly don’t remember the case. I’m guessing if you are a prosecutor, and you remember the case, then you probably lost the trial.

As for the defense use of R.E., the basic thrust of any argument against R.E. is that a STATE expert can almost never have enough information from which to draw a reliable opinion. The same is usually not true of a defense expert, who unlike a state expert, has unfettered access to the defendant. Also, there is a significant difference in the manner in which state evidence is evaluated when compared with evidence presented by a defendant. For more information on this topic, see: http://winbackyourlife.org/criminal-court-judges-have-limited-gate-keeping-function-for-defense-experts/

How come this here article says you cain’t use that there retrograde extrapolation, when you’ve had C. Dennis Simpson testify about lower BAC;s through use of this here technique?

Approve