Is the second amendment inalienable "Right” really a “Right” when the government Eternally Debars the “Right to keep and bear arms” based on one’s drinking and driving record of 3 DUI convictions? (Felony) A Victimless Crime & Void of any injured party.

QUESTION: What prevents the federal government from debarring the “second amendment right” or any other right based on acquiring 10 or more points on a driving record as they have for acquiring 3 drinking while driving convictions? (Michigan Endorsed)
How can lawmakers remove an inalienable protected “Right” such as the Second Amendment right rather than another protected right, such as free speech, choice of religion, speedy trial or even the right to counsel? (What does inalienable protected right really mean?)
Driving under the influence of alcohol has absolutely NO relationship with the second amendment protected “Right” of the people to keep and bear arms or to be secure in their homes, or ones choice of religion, regardless the number of DUI convictions.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." – Thomas Jefferson

The government contends that a person’s driving record of 3 DUI convictions poses a serious risk factor to society and should therefore have their “Right” to keep and bear arms Eternally Debarred void of any chance of future restoration.

Shouldn’t the government first eternally debar (Remove) the drivers “Privilege” (A Non Protected Right) of operating a motor vehicle first before they even think of debarring (Removing) the drivers guaranteed & protected inalienable second amendment “Right” to posses a firearm void of reinstatement? (Think about this) Which removal would tend to actually save lives?

The government currently reinstates the drivers “Privilege” of operating a motor vehicle void of question, yet eternally & forever debars the drivers “Right” to ever own or possess a firearm for the EXACT same drinking & driving offense of 3 dui convictions. (HOW CAN THIS POSSIBLY BE AND WHERE IS THE SOUND REASONING?)

Drunk drivers kill thousands of motorists each year: Debarring the drunk drivers protected “Right” to keep and bear arms has not saved even one motorist or life, ever! Yet the laws allow for reinstatement of the driving “Privilege” (which is not even a “Right”) and do not have the protections of a “Right” (Is the governments concern with saving lives or removing gun rights?)

In Fact, Debarring the “Privilege” to ever operate a motor vehicle WOULD SAVE countless lives and WOULD NOT infringe upon the Constitutionally Protected God given inalienable “Right” of any free man! Eternally debarring the right to possess a firearm has not saved a single life and utterly tramples upon our inalienable God given & Constitutionally protected rights of all free men!

THE ROOT AND PROBLEM vs. PRIVILEGE AND RIGHT: (RIGHT vs. PRIVILEGE DISTINCTION)

The “Privilege” of operating a motor vehicle is a mere “Privilege,” “and is NOT A RIGHT”: For 3 drinking & driving convictions the” Privilege” of driving has a time frame provision for absolute & full reinstatement & restoration of the driving privilege.

The “Right” to Keep and Bear Arms, “IS A Right” and “is NOT simply a mere Privilege”:
For 3 drinking & driving convictions, this “RIGHT” to keep and bear arms is eternally and forever debarred void of time frame provision for reinstatement. (SHOULDN’T THIS BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE?)

Regardless of one’s personal & moral stand on drinking and driving, there should be a positive reinstatement provision for the guaranteed inalienable protected “Right” of the people to keep and bear arms as there is positive provision for reinstatement of a mere “Privilege of operating a motor vehicle for the exact same drinking & driving offense of 3 drinking & driving convictions. (Do you agree?)

This usurpation of the people’s second amendment right should unequivocally be re-evaluated with this clear & sound reasoning of facts. If this were not so, why wouldn’t the government eternally debar the privilege to the driver from ever operating a motor vehicle which would save countless lives instead of going after the removal of the second amendment right which has never saved even a single life?

Shouldn’t Constitutionally Protected Rights take front seat to a mere privilege?
PLEASE CONTACT YOUR STATE & LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATIVES FOR LAW REFORM