<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DUI Lawyers as Highly Paid Enablers</title>
	<atom:link href="/dui-lawyers-as-highly-paid-enablers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://winbackyourlife.org/dui-lawyers-as-highly-paid-enablers/</link>
	<description>Survive Your Michigan DUI Arrest - CALL (248) 306-9159 for your FREE case review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:14:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kennedy</title>
		<link>https://winbackyourlife.org/dui-lawyers-as-highly-paid-enablers/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 16:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://winbackyourlife.org/?p=541#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Years ago, I ran a first-offender program for a court.  A big problem was that the DWI lawyers were not emphasizing the disconnect between criminal culpability/likelihood of legal guilt and whether the client had a problem.  This led to clients believing things like &quot;I don&#039;t have a problem, breath machines screw up.&quot; or, &quot;I don&#039;t have a problem, I passed the field tests.&quot;  My favorite is &quot;The cop didn&#039;t show up, the case was dismissed, I was never drunk!&quot;  Attorneys doing DWI work have an obligation to address the whole client--if a client has a test north of a .16 and did OK on fields, that&#039;s a good sign of tolerance and a drinking problem.  Send &#039;em off to treatment.  Granted, the business doesn&#039;t allow so much for hand-holding, but some obligation to get the client to see the bigger picture apart from whether the charge can be &#039;beat&#039; does exist.
I&#039;ve tried more than a thousand DWIs myself, and been a judge on about 6000 more.  Just had to add a little something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, I ran a first-offender program for a court.  A big problem was that the DWI lawyers were not emphasizing the disconnect between criminal culpability/likelihood of legal guilt and whether the client had a problem.  This led to clients believing things like &#8220;I don&#8217;t have a problem, breath machines screw up.&#8221; or, &#8220;I don&#8217;t have a problem, I passed the field tests.&#8221;  My favorite is &#8220;The cop didn&#8217;t show up, the case was dismissed, I was never drunk!&#8221;  Attorneys doing DWI work have an obligation to address the whole client&#8211;if a client has a test north of a .16 and did OK on fields, that&#8217;s a good sign of tolerance and a drinking problem.  Send &#8216;em off to treatment.  Granted, the business doesn&#8217;t allow so much for hand-holding, but some obligation to get the client to see the bigger picture apart from whether the charge can be &#8216;beat&#8217; does exist.<br />
I&#8217;ve tried more than a thousand DWIs myself, and been a judge on about 6000 more.  Just had to add a little something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
