As has been explained in various articles throughout this web site if you are a repeat drunk driver in Michigan then you will have your driver’s license revoked for life. After that happens, the only way to get your license back will be to file a petition for Driver License Restoration (DLR). You will have to wait at least one year before you may do so, but you may be required to wait a minimum of five years before first requesting a hearing.
Once your waiting period has run, Rule 13 will govern your DLR hearing. According to Rule 13, at the DLR hearing the petitioner (person requesting the license) must show a minimum period of 6-12 months of sobriety. This time period will depend on the facts and circumstances of the case, but in most instances you must show at least one year of total abstinence from alcohol and drugs.
Michigan statutes also cover this sobriety issue. MCL 257.313 (1)(b)(iii) says that a petitioner may be required to establish 12 months of sobriety if “[t]hat petitioner has attempted to bring his or her alcohol or controlled substance abuse problems, if any, under control, but suffered a relapse by using, on at least one occasion, alcohol or a controlled substance…”
Now, the question that often comes up in a DLR hearing is whether or not your time on probation counts as sober time? Some hearing officers believe that it does not. This creates a dilemma because a person will often still be on probation when they first try to get their license back. In fact most repeat drunk drivers in Michigan will be on probation for a minimum of two to three years, but can request a DLR hearing after the first year. Consequently, if the hearing officers are correct, then the one year waiting period set forth in Michigan’s statutes might actually become three or more years.
It is our opinion that the hearing officers that believe this to be true are clearly wrong. This is because their opinions are based on the case of Deborah Braddock Reynolds v. Secretary of State, Michigan Court of appeals, Docket number 269714, dated July 13, 2006. The court in this case ruled that ‘[B]ased on the evidence presented, the hearing officer’s determination that petitioner was required to maintain at least 12 months of current abstinence or sobriety outside of the controlled environment of imprisonment or parole….’ was appropriate.
Ok, so yes, I agree that time of incarceration does not count, but the case says nothing about probation. Michigan law makes it clear also that probation is NOT the same thing as incarceration. Parole is also a different story, but it is my opinion that sober time on probation clearly counts.