Five Reasons Retrograde Extrapolation Should Not Be Allowed In DUI Cases

I have written previously in this blog about the unreliability of retrograde extrapolation in drunk driving cases. 

 This is an important topic because state experts in drunk driving cases often will come into court and try to convince the jury that the driver’s blood alcohol at the time of the driving was higher than at the time of the test.

 This practice is very common in OWI Causing Death cases because the blood evidence is usually several hours old.

The following list of five reasons retrograde extrapolation is unreliable is from Dr. Stefan Rose from the state of Florida:

  1.  The most important fact for any retrograde extrapolation is for the subject to be in the pure elimination phase of ethanol kinetics.  This is nearly impossible to know with certainty because it is impossible to know with certainty that the driver is fully absorbed.  There are large population differences in how long full absorption of alcohol may take.
  2.  The best way to determine the above is for multiple, timed blood samples to be taken from the subject in the time interval from crash (stop) to blood draw of interest. That only happens in clinical controlled trials.  It never happens with a drunk driving case where there is only one blood draw or two breath tests taken nearly simultaneously.
  3.  The next method is to determine when the drinking episode began and ended, what alcohol beverages were consumed (number of drinks, alcohol per drink and time of each drink), what the absorption time for each drink was (impossible to predict) and what the cumulative absorption time for all the drinks was.  The police almost never ask these questions and therefore the state expert will not have this information available to them.
  4. Finally, what is the elimination rate of alcohol for that subject at that time? Can not be predicted, only measured, as above.  Again, there are large population differences and elimination rates can be as low as about .009 to as high as about .40 at the extreme ranges.
  5. Therefore State witness is not able to provide a scientifically reliable estimate of the BAC at any given point in time. Only the BAC result of the blood draw can be used.

Bottom line is this; retrograde extrapolation in a drunk driving case is only guess work and in criminal cases state witnesses should never be allowed to guess!

  • How the Barone Defense Firm Handles a Michigan DUI Case

    Every year more and more people charged with drunk driving in Michigan hire the Barone

    Read More »

  • The Science of Alcohol Metabolism and Tolerance

    Sometimes, as part of a zealous attempt to obtain a conviction in a drunk driving

    Read More »

  • Alcohol Tolerance is Not Relevant in a Michigan DUI Trial

    As was pointed out in a prior article, during a Michigan DUI trial some prosecutors

    Read More »

  • DataMaster Interference Filters Don’t Always Work

    I teach a course entitled “Drunk Driving: Law and Practice” at the Auburn Campus of

    Read More »

  • How to Argue and Win Your Next OWI Trial

    Every DUI lawyer knows that winning OWI trials requires persuading juries to disregard  a breath

    Read More »

  • Blood Tests in DUI Cases Not Always Accurate

    Many Michigan DUI lawyers see blood tests as nearly impossible to defend.  This may be

    Read More »

Nearly 2000 of Michigan’s citizens have done just what we hope you will do – hire the Barone Defense Firm to represent them in their Michigan drunk driving case.